Home>Leadership In Service>Taxes for welfare
Taxes for welfare
Leadership In Service

Taxes for welfare

In his latest book, Dr. Ishrat Husain has rightly highlighted that under the existing tax system, less-privileged segments of society are subjected to oppressive taxation. What makes the situation more painful is the fact that money collected is not used for the welfare of the public but to finance the benefits of the elites. I am referring to the militro-judicial-civil complex and politicians in power. The elites enjoy tax-free perquisites, benefits, including expensive plots at prime locations. The way our governments — military and civilian alike — have been wasting and plundering the taxpayers’ money is not a secret. Since independence, no serious effort has ever been made to undertake institutional reforms to democratise a mighty militro-judicial-civil apparatus which has miserably failed to deliver.

Pakistan has failed to achieve durable political stabilisation and fast economic growth due to the perpetual failure of the ruling elites. The twin menace of burgeoning debt and monstrous fiscal deficit testifies to continuous fiscal mismanagement. The government has to borrow more and more money — externally and internally — just to meet day to day expenses. With the fiscal deficit now reaching over Rs 2 trillion and debt burden crossing Rs 30 trillion, there is nothing on the plate to overcome this mess. There is no plan with any political party to uplift Pakistan’s rural areas to a respectable status to check rising migration to urban areas, which is fast becoming a nightmare with every passing day.

The dire need in today’s Pakistan is to tap the real tax potential and make the country a self-reliant economy, stop wasteful, unproductive expenses, cut the size of cabinet and government machinery, make government-owned corporations profitable, accelerate industrialisation and increase productivity, improve agricultural sector, reduce inequalities through a policy of redistribution of income and wealth. It is high time that professionals and civil society campaign against oppressive, anti-people tax policies and relentlessly raise their voice for the establishment of an egalitarian state. We can make Pakistan a self-reliant and prosperous country through fiscal decentralisation and grass root taxation at the local government level. There is nothing to be pessimistic about, solutions are available. The only thing we require is to present ideas, debate them publically and convince our political parties to make them a part of their manifestos. Elections should be fought on these issues and with the pledge, that on winning, they would be tackled and solved.

The twin menace of burgeoning debt and monstrous fiscal deficit testifies to continuous fiscal mismanagement. The government has to borrow more and more money — externally and internally — just to meet day to day expenses

Municipal taxation should be our top priority as envisaged under Article 140A of the Constitution. Political, administrative and fiscal decentralisation is the key to democratisation of institutions. This is the most neglected area in Pakistan. Article 140A requires that decision-making powers should be with the elected local governments. A council, elected by the residents, must enjoy the right to levy municipal taxes. Municipalities should be given wide-ranging powers. Extensive functions that fall within the specific sphere of authority must include education, health care and social welfare services. The municipalities should also be responsible for matters related to the residents’ free-time, recreation, housing, and the management and maintenance of their living environment (such as roads, streets, water supply and sewerage), as well as land-use planning and functional municipal structures.

In all successful democratic models, taxes at the grass root level play a critical role in municipal self-governance. The power to levy and collect taxes is one of the cornerstones of municipal self-governance as it ensures that the municipalities can manage the functions that they have undertaken to execute or those for which they are responsible for under the law. In social democratic countries such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland, the most important feature of fiscal management and delivery of social services is municipal tax. In 2016, Finland collected $40 billion as municipal tax — total tax collection of $172 billion was 44.1 percent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In Pakistan, total tax collection — both at the federal and provincial level in the fiscal year 2016-17 amounted to $32.66 billion, which is only 11.5 percent of a GDP of US$ 284 billion.

If a country of 5.495 million people like Finland can achieve a 44 percent tax-to-GDP level and provide free health and education through municipal taxation, we as a nation of 207.775 million can definitely do much more, provided there is political will to do so. One of the central constitutional principles regarding municipal self-governance in Finland is that when allocating new functions to municipalities, the State also has to ensure that they have the necessary resources to carry them out. Finland has a well-functioning relationship between the State and the local authorities, as well as a state-subsidy system which ensures municipal resources and residents’ equal access to services. We can learn from Finland’s great innovation. To do so could change the fate of our nation in a short span of time.

We have the resources we need, but the system for self-governance as in vogue in Finland and elsewhere in the world is non-existent despite the clear command contained in Article 140A of the Constitution. Resultantly, power is not with the people but in the hands of a privileged few.

Economic equality and prosperity, peace and social tranquillity can never be achieved unless the taxation system is restructured and a social welfare model is implemented as explained and elaborated in a study titled, Towards Flat, Low-Rate, Broad & Predictable Taxes.

We need to implement Article 140A in letter and spirit. Mere existence of local governments without devolvement of political, administrative and financial power is not the fulfilment of constitutional command. Decentralisation of financial powers requires levy and collection of taxes by local governments to meet the needs of local residents in the form of education, health care and social welfare services. Municipalities working on the principle of self-governance alone can ensure that revenues are spent exclusively for the benefit of the public and not the powerful segments of society alone.

The writer, Advocate Supreme Court, is Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS). Email: [email protected]; Twitter: @drikramulhaq

Link to published article: click to open

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.